QGIS Web ClientvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS Web Client | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 1 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
QGIS Web Client details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with