Project N.O.M.A.D.vsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Project N.O.M.A.D. | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 41 116 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 902 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..
If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 902 stars in 30 days).
Project N.O.M.A.D. details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with