OTOBOvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OTOBO | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 338 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Perl | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.
OTOBO details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep OTOBO, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with