chatwootvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 38 515 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 354 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
chatwoot scores 84/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 354 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →Windows ARM details →