Windows ARMvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with