OpenScribevstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenScribe | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Healthcare | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 223 | 16 647 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +260 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 49 |
| Latest release | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenScribe is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).
OpenScribe details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenScribe, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with