Open Data Capturevstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Data Capture | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Data Collection | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 119 | 16 647 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +260 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 49 |
| Latest release | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Open Data Capture.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Data Capture is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).
Open Data Capture details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Data Capture, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with