MirobodyvsOpenScribe
Two self-hosted Healthcare projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | OpenScribe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 1 395 | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Mirobody scores 56/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.
Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.
Mirobody details →OpenScribe details →All Healthcare projects →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep OpenScribe, compare it with