openHop Repeatervsscanopy
Two self-hosted Network projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openHop Repeater | scanopy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 5 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +119 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 40 |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
scanopy scores 64/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.
If you want the quickest setup, scanopy is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
scanopy is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).
openHop Repeater details →scanopy details →All Network projects →
Swap a project
Keep openHop Repeater, compare it with
Keep scanopy, compare it with