IPFS Web UIvsscanopy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | scanopy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 5 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +119 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 40 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
scanopy scores 64/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; scanopy needs more configuration.
scanopy is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →scanopy details →