IPFS Web UIvsopenHop Repeater
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | openHop Repeater | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
IPFS Web UI scores 60/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
IPFS Web UI ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
IPFS Web UI details →openHop Repeater details →