openHop RepeatervsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openHop Repeater | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 21 |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
openHop Repeater details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep openHop Repeater, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with