copypartyvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 153 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +380 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+380 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with