ReadMeABookvsscanopy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | scanopy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 5 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +119 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 40 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook and scanopy score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, scanopy is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook details →scanopy details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep scanopy, compare it with