MuckScrapervsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MuckScraper | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 159 | 41 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 76 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MuckScraper.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
MuckScraper details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep MuckScraper, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with