MuckScrapervsRSS-Bridge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MuckScraper | RSS-Bridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 4 in RSS |
| GitHub stars | 159 | 9 321 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Unlicense |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
RSS-Bridge scores 74/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.
MuckScraper ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RSS-Bridge.
If you want the quickest setup, RSS-Bridge is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.
RSS-Bridge is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).
MuckScraper details →RSS-Bridge details →
Swap a project
Keep MuckScraper, compare it with
Keep RSS-Bridge, compare it with