MuckScrapervsRSSHub
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MuckScraper | RSSHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 159 | 46 706 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +397 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 83 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.27-8486.1d73c7c · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
RSSHub scores 85/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.
RSSHub ships more often: 83 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MuckScraper.
If you want the quickest setup, RSSHub is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.
RSSHub is growing faster right now (+397 stars in 30 days).
MuckScraper details →RSSHub details →
Swap a project
Keep MuckScraper, compare it with
Keep RSSHub, compare it with