Standard Notesvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Standard Notes | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 684 | 114 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +3 543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 8 |
| Latest release | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
Standard Notes details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with