Gristvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grist | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 12 011 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +160 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Grist scores 75/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
Grist details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Grist, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with