OpenBBvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenBB | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Data Management | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 74 831 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +347 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | openbb-v5.0.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenBB scores 87/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenBB.
OpenBB is growing faster right now (+347 stars in 30 days).
OpenBB details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenBB, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with