elasticsearchvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 78 421 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +452 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 11 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
elasticsearch scores 83/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
elasticsearch is growing faster right now (+452 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with