duragraphvsWOML
Two self-hosted Temporal alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| duragraph | WOML | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in AI Workflows | #21 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 161 | 156 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.8.1 · 10 Sept 2026 | v1.1.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
WOML scores 46/100 against 43/100 for duragraph, so it is the safer default.
duragraph ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WOML.
WOML is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
duragraph details →WOML details → All Temporal alternatives →