duragraphvsflow-like
Two self-hosted Temporal alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| duragraph | flow-like | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in AI Workflows | #17 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 161 | 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.8.1 · 10 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
flow-like scores 50/100 against 43/100 for duragraph, so it is the safer default.
duragraph ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for flow-like.
If you want the quickest setup, duragraph is easier to run; flow-like needs more configuration.
flow-like is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
duragraph details →flow-like details → All Temporal alternatives →