duragraphvshatchet
Two self-hosted Temporal alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| duragraph | hatchet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in AI Workflows | #8 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 161 | 8 195 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +203 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.8.1 · 10 Sept 2026 | py/1.43.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
hatchet scores 72/100 against 43/100 for duragraph, so it is the safer default.
hatchet ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for duragraph.
hatchet is growing faster right now (+203 stars in 30 days).
duragraph details →hatchet details → All Temporal alternatives →