duragraphvswindmill
Two self-hosted Temporal alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| duragraph | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in AI Workflows | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 161 | 18 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 161 |
| Latest release | v0.8.1 · 10 Sept 2026 | v1.851.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
windmill scores 77/100 against 43/100 for duragraph, so it is the safer default.
windmill ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for duragraph.
windmill is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
duragraph details →windmill details → All Temporal alternatives →