flow-likevsWOML
Two self-hosted n8n alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| flow-like | WOML | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #21 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 968 | 156 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v1.1.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
flow-like scores 50/100 against 46/100 for WOML, so it is the safer default.
WOML ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for flow-like.
If you want the quickest setup, WOML is easier to run; flow-like needs more configuration.
WOML is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
flow-like details →WOML details → All n8n alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep flow-like, compare it with
Keep WOML, compare it with