DeepSeek Harnessvspandaprobe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | pandaprobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #43 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 265 723 | 792 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 731 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.
pandaprobe ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 731 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →pandaprobe details →