Orcavspandaprobe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | pandaprobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #43 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 109 990 | 792 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 083 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 16 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for pandaprobe.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; pandaprobe needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+10 083 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →pandaprobe details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep pandaprobe, compare it with