DeepSeek Harnessvslangflow
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 377 | 156 085 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 385 | +894 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 87/100 for DeepSeek Harness, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 385 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →langflow details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with