ConcatvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 12 510 | 89 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 511 | +2 403 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
Concat details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with