ConcatvsDuix.Avatar
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Duix.Avatar | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #20 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 12 374 | 16 120 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 375 | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 68/100 for Duix.Avatar, so it is the safer default.
Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Duix.Avatar.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Duix.Avatar needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 375 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Duix.Avatar details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Duix.Avatar, compare it with