automatic-ripping-machinevsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 89 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +2 403 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 17 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 403 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →World Monitor details →