ConcatvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 525 | 38 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 526 | +638 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 526 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Trilium Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with