automatic-ripping-machinevsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 38 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +638 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 14 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Trilium Notes.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+638 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Trilium Notes details →