ConcatvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 478 | 95 289 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 479 | +2 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 25 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Concat details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with