automatic-ripping-machinevsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 95 299 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +2 337 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 25 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 337 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Stirling-PDF details →