ConcatvsRetrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 12 421 | 38 919 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 422 | +428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 77/100 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI, so it is the safer default.
Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 422 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI, compare it with