Duix.AvatarvsRetrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Duix.Avatar | Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 125 in AI | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 16 129 | 38 925 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +412 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI scores 77/100 against 67/100 for Duix.Avatar, so it is the safer default.
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Duix.Avatar.
If you want the quickest setup, Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is easier to run; Duix.Avatar needs more configuration.
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is growing faster right now (+412 stars in 30 days).
Duix.Avatar details →Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Duix.Avatar, compare it with
Keep Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI, compare it with