automatic-ripping-machinevsRetrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 38 922 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +431 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI scores 77/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI.
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is growing faster right now (+431 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI details →