CollectiveAccessvsGhostfolio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CollectiveAccess | Ghostfolio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 15 in Asset Management | #3 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 387 | 9 597 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 104 |
| Latest release | 2.0.11 · 16 Mar 2026 | 3.94.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Ghostfolio scores 75/100 against 55/100 for CollectiveAccess, so it is the safer default.
Ghostfolio ships more often: 104 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for CollectiveAccess.
If you want the quickest setup, Ghostfolio is easier to run; CollectiveAccess needs more configuration.
Ghostfolio is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
CollectiveAccess details →Ghostfolio details →
Swap a project
Keep CollectiveAccess, compare it with
Keep Ghostfolio, compare it with