CollectiveAccessvsSnipe-IT
Two self-hosted Asset Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CollectiveAccess | Snipe-IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 15 in Asset Management | #1 of 15 in Asset Management |
| GitHub stars | 387 | 15 109 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +138 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 17 |
| Latest release | 2.0.11 · 16 Mar 2026 | v8.8.3 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Snipe-IT scores 77/100 against 55/100 for CollectiveAccess, so it is the safer default.
Snipe-IT ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for CollectiveAccess.
If you want the quickest setup, Snipe-IT is easier to run; CollectiveAccess needs more configuration.
Snipe-IT is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
CollectiveAccess details →Snipe-IT details →All Asset Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep CollectiveAccess, compare it with
Keep Snipe-IT, compare it with