GlassFlow ClickHouse ETLvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 156 121 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +899 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+899 stars in 30 days).
GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL details →langflow details →
Swap a project
Keep GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with