airbytevsGlassFlow ClickHouse ETL
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| airbyte | GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Engineering | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 22 282 | 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +156 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
airbyte scores 75/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.
GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for airbyte.
airbyte is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
airbyte details →GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL details →
Swap a project
Keep airbyte, compare it with
Keep GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, compare it with