GlassFlow ClickHouse ETLvsDagu
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | Dagu | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #10 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 4 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +405 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 65 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | v2.24.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Dagu scores 68/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.
Dagu ships more often: 65 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.
If you want the quickest setup, Dagu is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.
Dagu is growing faster right now (+405 stars in 30 days).
GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL details →Dagu details →
Swap a project
Keep GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, compare it with
Keep Dagu, compare it with