GlassFlow ClickHouse ETLvslogstash
Two self-hosted Data Pipeline projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | logstash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #2 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 14 969 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 32 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
logstash scores 72/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.
logstash ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.
If you want the quickest setup, logstash is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.
logstash is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL details →logstash details →All Data Pipeline projects →
Swap a project
Keep GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, compare it with
Keep logstash, compare it with