GlassFlow ClickHouse ETLvsKestra
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | Kestra | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 30 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 736 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 59 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.
If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 736 stars in 30 days).
GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL details →Kestra details →
Swap a project
Keep GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, compare it with
Keep Kestra, compare it with