bookorbitvsConcat
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Concat | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 12 409 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 | +2 410 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
bookorbit details →Concat details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Concat, compare it with