ConcatvsLibrum
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Librum | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #5 of 7 in E-book Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 421 | 5 318 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 422 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 60/100 for Librum, so it is the safer default.
Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Librum.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Librum needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 422 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Librum details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Librum, compare it with