Concatvsgrimmory
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | grimmory | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 12 in Book Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 421 | 4 624 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 422 | +205 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.5.0 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 69/100 for grimmory, so it is the safer default.
grimmory ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; grimmory needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 422 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →grimmory details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep grimmory, compare it with