avideovsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 12 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
SonarQube scores 71/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
SonarQube is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with